2 cases to keep our eyes on: DVD CCA v. Kaleidescape, DVD CCA & MPAA v. Real
Friday, October 30th, 2009Why bother with these cases?
Because the outcomes of these cases could help clear up the “fair use doctrine” for consumers, content producers and manufacturers.
It may also help establish some redeeming value to DMCA:
In its “circumvention” provisions, the DMCA prohibits the manufacturing or trafficking of products designed to circumvent measures that protect copyrighted titles.
Most fair-use-loving authorities will concede that DVD rippers that chuck the CSS schemes don’t pass muster with the DMCA.
“But is it circumvention if the manufacturer makes bit-for-bit copies of copyrighted DVDs? The big studios think it is. Under the auspices of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), they sued RealNetworks for its RealDVD ripping software, claiming violations under the DMCA.
In the most recent decision, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel upheld her original preliminary injunction against Real, prohibiting the company from distributing RealDVD until the case concludes. The court concluded that Real violated both contract with the DVD CCA, as well as the DMCA provisions that prohibit the trafficking of anti-circumvention devices.”
For more information on what has transpired over the past 4 years in these cases, visit this link to Julie Jacobson’s article in CEPro.